您还未登录! 登录 | 注册 | 帮助  

您的位置: 首页 > 软件测试工具 > 功能测试工具 > 正文

对比AppScan Source和Fortify扫描AltoroJ的结果

发表于:2017-01-09 作者:网络转载 来源: 点击数:

  1、漏洞总数
  AppScan Source:91
  Fortify:121
  2、Disclaimer.htm:34(Cross-Site Scripting:DOM)的漏洞Fortify能扫描出来,AppScan Source扫描不出来
  另外,Fortify能扫描出比较多Persistent类型的XSS漏洞
  并且归类比较好(分DOM、Persistent、Reflected类型列出)
  3、AdminLoginServlet.java:35(Password Management:Hardcoded Password)的漏洞Fortify能扫描出来,AppScan Source扫描不出来
  4、Fortify扫出的DBUtil.java:238(Access Control:Database)在AppScan中被归类到SQL Injection
  5、admin.jsp:18(Password Management:Empty Password)属于误报
<script language="javascript">
function confirmpass(myform)
{
if (myform.password1.value.length && (myform.password1.value==myform.password2.value))
{
return true;
}
else
{
myform.password1.value="";
myform.password2.value="";
myform.password1.focus();
alert ("Passwords do not match");
return false;
}
}
</script>
  6、Fortify会报比较多这类问题:
Code Correctness:Class Does Not Implement equals
Hardcoded Domain in HTML
Hidden Field
J2EE Bad Practices
J2EE Misconfiguration
Missing Check against Null
Password Management:Password in Comment
Poor Error Handling
System Information Leak:Incomplete Servlet Error Handling
  7、Fortify会报比较多transfer.jsp:32(Cross-Site Request Forgery)这类CSRF的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来
  8、Fortify有扫出ServletUtil.java(Missing XML Validation)的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来
  9、Fortify有扫出AdminServlet.java:65(Redundant Null Check)的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来